Young girl crying while receiving a vaccine

Confirmatory Bias in Health Decisions: The MMR Vaccine and Autism Controversy

Shin-Yi Chou and Ernest Lai investigate how conflicting information figures into health decisions.

Story by

Mary Ellen Alu

In 1998, British researcher Andrew Wakefield and his co-authors published a flawed study that linked autism to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, prompting a widespread scare among parents and triggering a drastic drop in measles vaccination rates worldwide.

A wealth of other scientific studies found no MMR-autism link.In 2010, when a British medical panel concluded that Wakefield had violated research ethics rules and had “callous disregard” for the children in the study, The Lancet medical journal retracted Wakefield’s paper and noted that statements in the paper had been “utterly false.” 

Despite the important scientific rebuttals to Wakefield’s study, the controversy persisted as parents continued to receive conflicting information, including from celebrities who made anti-vaccine pronouncements.    

Andrew Wakefield at vaccine protest

Andrew Wakefield’s study linking autism to the MMR vaccine was retracted.

The issue took on a new urgency in 2019, when measles, a highly contagious and potentially life-threatening disease, made a resurgence. That year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 1,282 cases of measles in 31 states—the largest number of reported measles cases since 1992.

In a new study, "Confirmatory Bias in Health Decisions: Evidence from the MMR-Autism Controversy," economists Shin-Yi Chou, the Arthur F. Searing Professof of Economics; Ernest Lai, the Class of ‘61 Associate Professor of Economics; and former graduate student Mengcen Qian use the ongoing controversy as a natural experiment to investigate how conflicting information figures into health decisions.

Earlier studies using U.K. and U.S. data showed an educational gap in vaccinations: Children in more educated families were more likely to delay their MMR vaccinations. Chou and Qian, as a starting point in their empirical study, found the same trend in the U.S. from 1998 to 2011. In examining the data in connection with parents’ exposure to vaccine safety information, they found “an interesting asymmetry”—a stronger response to negative news than positive news.

Quantifying relevant newspaper coverage and online searches, they found the immunization rate among the more educated group had decreased substantially more in response to negative news about the MMR vaccine than had increased in response to positive news.

To Lai, who constructed a behavioral economic model to complement the empirical analysis, the trend suggested confirmatory bias—people’s tendency to select and interpret information that confirms their existing beliefs. The more educated parents likely had more exposure to the initial misinformation about the vaccine, he says, and the bias affected them more.

“It’s something that psychologists have documented in the lab for a long time, but few studies have examined such biases in a real-world setting,” says Lai.  “If I run into some fact that is contradictory to my beliefs, it’s painful to me. A natural response is, I would try to avoid such information, or I would selectively search for information that would be consistent with my beliefs.”

The study appeared in the Journal of Health Economics.

The researchers also found that online information, whether positive or negative, has the strongest impact on vaccination rates. Though not conclusive, Lai says, this suggests that health advocates could better tackle biases by putting more resources online to spread the information that vaccines are safe.

Story by

Mary Ellen Alu

Related Stories

Man picking apples

Ahmed Rahman Examines How Technology & Lower-Skilled Immigrant Workers Impact Wage Distributions

Study observes how the interactions between technological growth and specialization patterns between native and immigrant workers affect wages earned by native workers.

Unidentifiable pregnant woman with hands over belly

Pregnant Women with Long Commutes to Work at Increased Risk for Adverse Birth Outcomes

Lehigh researcher Muzhe Yang co-authored the first study of the infant health impacts of maternal stress caused by long-distance commuting.

Tail of a plane seen through another plane's window

The Impact of Demonstrated Interest on College Admissions

A study by a team of economists including James Dearden, Chad Meyerhoefer and Muzhe Yang finds that selective universities can give significant preference to applicants who demonstrate interest.