Muzhe Yang: Strenuous Work During Pregnancy Increases Likelihood of High Birth Weight

New research attributes an adverse fetal outcome to the strenuousness of an expectant mother’s job. 

Story by

Lori Friedman

Doctor checks pregnant woman

Photo: iStock/Daniel Besic

For the first time, researchers have attributed an understudied adverse fetal outcome to the strenuousness of an expectant mother’s job. 

The researchers matched data on maternal and fetal health, as well as job data, from the New Jersey Department of Health with an objective measurement of job strenuousness. They found that women in relatively strenuous jobs have a 17% increase in the likelihood of having a baby with fetal macrosomia. Fetal macrosomia―having a birth weight of over 4,000 grams or 8.8 pounds―is associated with a higher risk of being overweight as an adolescent. The condition is also associated with a higher risk of breast cancer for the mother.

The study, “Maternal and fetal health effects of working during pregnancy” is authored by Muzhe Yang, professor of economics at Lehigh, and Dhaval Dave, professor of economics at Bentley University, and has been published in the Review of Economics of the Household.

Previous research in this area has relied on self-reporting of physical activities, which may be biased (and a conflation of work-related and leisure-time activities), and only looked at certain activities in isolation rather than the overall level of physical activity demanded by a job. Demanding job-related activities include heavy lifting, prolonged standing or repeated bending.

To determine the job strenuousness of the mothers represented in the New Jersey Department of Health data, Yang and Dave used an objective measuring tool, provided by the federal Census Occupational Classification System, called the Metabolic Equivalent of Task, which rates the level of physical activity associated with various jobs.

“Our findings also indicate an understudied link between gestational diabetes, which is a known risk factor for fetal macrosomia, and intensive physical activities at work during pregnancy,” said Yang.

Specifically, compared with light-intensity activity, Yang and Dave found that moderate-intensity activity at work during pregnancy is associated with an increase in the likelihood of fetal macrosomia of about 1.5 percentage points or 17%. One possible mechanism underlying this finding, they say, is sleep-deprivation-induced diabetes developed during pregnancy leading to fetal macrosomia. There is some evidence suggesting an adverse effect of strenuous activities at work on sleep quality―and sleep deprivation has been found to correlate with diabetes.

According to data from the Current Population Survey (CPS), a primary source of labor force statistics for the population of the U.S., the share of women working while pregnant grew from 44% in 1967 to 68% in 2018.

“Expectant mothers are also working longer hours and further into their pregnancy, making it particularly important to understand how job attributes are affecting pregnancy outcomes,” said Yang.

Working during pregnancy is generally considered safe for most women with uncomplicated pregnancies, although special guidelines have been issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists with respect to jobs that have particular physical demands.

The study, said Yang, sheds light on the possible inadequacy of existing accommodations laws, through the detection of an adverse birth outcome of pregnant women in strenuous jobs who are supposed to have access to reasonable accommodations. As of September 2020, only 30 states, plus D.C. and four cities (Central Falls, R.I.; New York, N.Y.; Philadelphia; Providence, R.I.), had passed laws requiring employers to provide reasonable accommodations to women affected by pregnancy, according to Yang. Even in states where accommodation laws are in place, adverse birth outcomes may still occur because of how much variation there is in the interpretation of “reasonable accommodations.”

“Focusing on New Jersey, which requires reasonable accommodations for pregnant women at the workplace if requested, our study points to the potential deficiencies of such laws by detecting adverse birth outcomes among pregnant women in strenuous jobs,” said Yang. “The adverse health effect we found could only be an underestimate of the true effect for the entire nation, and our finding reveals a need for establishing universal access to accommodations for pregnant women in strenuous jobs.”

The researchers urge lawmakers to consider the impact of strenuous work activities on maternal and fetal health when developing policies around employer requirements to provide reasonable accommodations for workers during pregnancy.

Story by

Lori Friedman

Related Stories

Illustration of Covid-19

Here’s Why Conservatives, Liberals Differ on COVID-19

New Lehigh Business study looks at getting everyone to agree on the pandemic threat.

illustration of an app attached to a shopping cart

Chad Meyerhoefer: Buying Your Food Online Now?

Meyerhoefer, professor in the economics department, examines how the pandemic changed buyers’ habits.

Students hunt for viruses in soil samples

What Happened to the Genomes—and the Fruit Flies?

Lehigh’s SEA-PHAGES lab and other labs began reopening in June to graduate students and research staff, as the state’s stay-at-home orders were eased.